ROSS: A MEMORY FROM LAIRD STABLER'S SERVICE
Posted: Feb. 28, 2008
What a great service for Laird
Stabler at Vicmead Hunt Club. He would have loved it and
been so proud of his children.
From where I was standing, I could
see a rather large gray horse. When there was a big
gust, you could see the horse “race the wind” back and
forth. It seemed like it was part of the service. It was
amazing.
Afterwards, I was asked if I had
noticed the horse. It was beautiful. I hope others were
able to witness it from where they were standing.
Hard to believe Laird is gone, but
those of us who had the pleasure of knowing him will
never forget.
Tom Ross
Wilmington Republican chair
# # #
SULLIVAN: IT AIN'T SO, GRAPEVINE
Posted: Dec. 21, 2007
Your
article entitled "It Ain't So, Joe" is the lowest
political shot I can remember.
I'm not a newcomer to politics. I am a lifelong
Republican who was particularly active in 1972. Senator
Cale Boggs was a close friend of mine, whom I
supported in his race against Joe Biden.
You did not mention the political climate in Delaware
after our beloved Senator Boggs was put out of office by
the hard work of Joe Biden and that of his wife Neilia.
Rumors
were rampant. Among the rumors were stories of a drunken
driver, a speeding driver, a visually impaired driver, a
truck with faulty brakes and a cover-up by police
controlled by Republicans. I know none of these rumors
to be true, but I do know that such statements were
being made all over Delaware.
In December 1972, Republicans controlled the governor's
office and thus the state police and the New Castle
County government and thus the county police and the
office of the mayor of the city of Wilmington and thus
the Wilmington police force. That is to say, Republicans
controlled every major police force in Delaware. More
importantly, Republicans controlled the Office of
Attorney General.
Having said all of that, I believe Jerry Herlihy's
version of what happened. However, you should have noted
that Jerry Herlihy was known to be a partisan Republican
activist who eventually became the chairman of the
Republican Party of Delaware. There were others who
disagreed with my belief in the Herlihy version of
events.
With all that said, I don't share your view that the
driver of the truck that broadsided the Biden vehicle
and killed Neilia Biden and her infant daughter Amy
should have feared retribution from anyone, least of
all, the Democratic Biden supporters. The fact is that
there was absolutely no chance that anything like
retribution would happen.
However, I can say that there were many people who
questioned whether the Republican-controlled police and
the Republican-controlled Office of the Attorney General
would make the proper calls. In my opinion, I believe
that the attorney general and the state police made the
right calls in every instance. But my view was not
shared by many partisan Democrats.
In that political climate, when thousands and thousands
of people were offering condolences to Joe Biden, were
they reading from an accident report? No, they were
saying how sorry they were because Neilia and Amy died
at the hands of a drunken driver, a speeding driver, an
impaired driver, etc.
Joe Biden heard those statements thousands of times in
his weakest moments
And I'm not new to the investigation of auto accidents
and what it takes to fairly charge a person with a crime
in an accident case. I know how difficult it is to
charge in a case where there are no apparent
eyewitnesses other than the person who drove the
striking vehicle.
You left out something that did not happen but could
have happened. Joe Biden did not set out with vengeance
in his heart to take a shot at the driver who drove the
truck that hit and killed his wife and daughter and
seriously injured his two sons.
He didn't send someone to scout the area around the
scene of the deaths of his wife and daughter. He didn't
hire a crime scene investigator in an effort to get a
pound of flesh from the driver of the truck and/or the
owner of the trucking company for whom he worked.
Joe Biden engaged no one to initiate a law suit which
would have permitted his lawyers to cross examine the
so-called "witnesses" mentioned in your article: the
driver of the striking vehicle, the owner of the
trucking company and the police officers. Nor did he
take the opportunity to bring in his own accident
reconstruction experts.
Here's something else you didn't consider and left out.
In 1972 Limestone Road was a two lane road, not the
expansive highway it is today. Its speed limit then was
40 miles per hour or less. Twenty feet of skid marks may
prove a vehicle to be speeding, depending on the weight
of the vehicle and the conditions of the roadway at the
time of the accident. So would the fact that the Biden
vehicle was propelled 150 feet from the point of impact.
Finally, in 1972, unlike today, blood tests of drivers
in fatal accidents were not mandatory. Then, according
to your article, after a two-day review by the attorney
general, the truck driver was cleared.
You should have left this Times news article alone. It
was not necessary for you to try to crush Joe Biden's
heart by telling him what's in the recesses of his mind
and memory.
Nor was it necessary to seek to validate a portion of a
paragraph in a book you wrote. However, it may be that
by writing this thoughtless article you could
generate enough interest among Biden foes to pay for the
production of your book.
In the weeks following the accident, Joe Biden heard a
thousand versions of the cause of the deaths of his dear
wife, Neilia and daughter, Amy. With respect to Joe
Biden's statements today as to what happened, of course,
he was not there. He is saying what was told to him by
others when he was at the lowest point in his life.
Joe Biden always says what he believes to be true.
Lawrence M. Sullivan
Delaware Public Defender
# # #