NEWS RELEASE
MINNER: VETO
FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY COUNCIL BILL
Posted: Jan. 30, 2004
Here is the text of Gov.
Ruth Ann Minner's veto message on a bill that would keep the New
Castle County Council at seven members, instead of expanding it to
13 members with the 2004 election.
TO
THE MEMBERS OF THE SENATE OF THE 142ND GENERAL ASSEMBLY:
Pursuant to Article III, Section 18 of the Delaware Constitution, I
am vetoing Senate Bill No. 53 by returning it to the Delaware State
Senate without my signature for reconsideration.
Senate
Bill No. 53 seeks to repeal action taken by the General Assembly
nearly eight years ago to expand the New Castle County Council, from
its current seven members to thirteen members (comprised of twelve
members representing councilmanic districts, and a president of
Council elected at large). In 1996, the General Assembly determined
that a seven-member Council for our State’s most populous County had
become unworkable, and directed that the Council be expanded from
seven to thirteen members during the next election cycle, that is,
incident to the 1998 election. Subsequently, the deadline for the
expansion of Council has twice been extended, and under current law
the Council is to be expanded as part of the upcoming 2004
election. In reliance on the law as it is currently written, New
Castle County Council has specially appointed a bi-partisan
commission of citizens to consider new councilperson election
districts. That commission painstakingly prepared new district maps
for the twelve newly drawn council districts. The commission’s
proposed maps were subject to review and comment by the public, and
on September 22, 2003 – just over 4 months ago – these maps were
finally adopted.
Two critical factors compel a veto of Senate Bill No. 53. The first
factor is procedural: it is simply too late in the day to again
deprive the citizens of New Castle County the Council structure that
they have been promised for eight years. An immeasurable amount of
time, money and effort has been expended to clear the way for this
expansion of Council in the coming year. While reasonable people
can debate whether the expansion should be to nine, ten, eleven or
twelve seats, the time for that debate has passed. County
government, and the citizens of New Castle County, have all expended
too much effort and energy in preparing for a new structure of
government to cavalierly dismiss such efforts.
Second, and more importantly, the grounds supporting an expansion of
New Castle County Council are more pressing today than they were
when the General Assembly initially approved the expansion due to
population growth. Currently, the average ratio of citizens to
Council members in New Castle County is over 84,000. Allowing the
expansion of Council as previously planned reduces that number to
about 42,000 residents per Councilperson. Even with that change, it
is significant that New Castle County’s councilpersons will still
represent on average a substantially greater number of citizens than
other elected officials in our State. By comparison, each member of
the State House of Representatives represents 19,418 citizens; each
member of the Delaware State Senate represents 37,912 citizens; each
Commissioner of the Kent County Levy Court represents 21,511
citizens, and each member of Sussex County Council represents 32,254
citizens. When reviewed in context, it is clear that the expansion
of New Castle County Council merely makes the ratio of
representation of Council members comparable to the ratio of other
elected legislative officials. Conversely, an expanded Council
structure helps to assure that each citizen of New Castle County has
a better chance of being well-represented, with the opportunity to
meet with his or her Councilperson and share views and suggestions,
and that important legislative matters will be addressed in a timely
and efficient manner. The citizens of New Castle County have waited
too long for representation on par with that of other counties and
legislative bodies to turn back now.
In light the timing with which Senate Bill No. 53 has been adopted
and presented, as well as the sound policy reasons that continue to
support a substantial expansion of the New Castle County Council, I
have concluded that veto of this legislation is appropriate and in
the best interests of New Castle County and its citizens.
RETURN TO MORE NEWS RELEASES
RETURN TO COVER PAGE
|